• نمونه مقاله آیلتس شماره۲

    Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

     Some people contend that mixed ability classes are more beneficial for children’s development than streaming them on the basis of judgment about their academic abilities. However, from others perspective, such approach is discriminatory and should be avoided.

    Admittedly, mixed ability classes provide a better environment for children’s all-round development. In such classes, children with different abilities study together and in turn they can learn from one another. From example, a student, who is good at academic study but weak in dancing or painting, can learn how to dance or paint form his peers. In this sense, mixed ability classes allow students to develop their abilities in different subjects instead of only academic abilities.

    Despite the argument above, advocates of the proposed idea opine streaming students brings more benefits to teachers and students. As for teachers, separating children with better academic abilities from others facilitates effective teaching. This practice helps teachers to control their students more conveniently and easier. Compared with mixed ability classes in which teachers should consider students’ differences when they are using teaching methodologies, streaming makes this situation simpler. To be more specific, students are at the same level of academic ability in a class, and in turn teachers can apply the same methodologies for them all. In this way, the narrower the spread of ability in the class, the more convenient the teaching can be.

    I myself maintain that streaming enables students to learn in an effective way. According to students’ different abilities, they are taught in ways that are more suitable for them. In the top streams, students use more difficult materials; therefore, they can learn more. In sharp contrast, teachers can explain the material more slowly to those in bottom streams. Under this circumstance, students with different academic abilities can study effectively and efficiently.

    Having considered all the above-mentioned facts, this conclusion can be drawn that mixed ability classes are beneficial for students’ versatile development, but in my opinion, segregating students based on different academic ability is better for both teachers and students.

      Analysis

    A. Task response:

    1. This essay has covered all parts of the given topic most probably because the candidate has spent enough time on comprehending the topic before he/she started to write.

    2. The candidate has stated his own opinion definitely regarding the topic not only in a separate paragraph (the 3rd paragraph) but also in conclusion.

    3. The central paragraphs of the essay have been supported with a range of techniques, (the 1st one with example, the 2nd one with comparison).

    4. Your essay is supposed to be minimum 250 and maximum 280 words professionally speaking. This candidate has applied 350 words, which has far exceeded the mentioned standard; consequently, it will be considered a weak point.

    B. Coherence & cohesion:

    1. This piece of writing is both coherent (ideas have been arranged logically) & cohesive due to the fact that the candidate has applied cohesive devices such as in contrast, however as well as transitions including admittedly. Needless to say, well-supported paragraphs are bound to be cohesive.

    C. Grammar:

    1. This candidate has used a wide range of structures including adjective clauses, compound/complex structures; more importantly, they are correct which mean the candidate has shown an excellent command of English structures by making mistakes in neither basic ones nor advanced ones.

    2. The candidate has paid special attention to punctuation which is a contributing factor in adding to your score.

    D. Vocabulary:

    1. This candidate has used appropriate & different words whose collocations are correct, for instance perspective, contend, segregate, discriminatory, …

    ۲٫ There is no sign of repetitive words or contractions in the essay; also, spelling and capitalization have been taken care of flawlessly.

    Examiner’s final comment:

    Totally, this essay seems good enough to be worthy of IELTS Band 8 because of the above-mentioned points. 

  • مقالات آیلتس همراه با تحلیل

    Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings, unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way.
    To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

    There is a lot of controversy about using animals for human needs. Animal rights activists are trying to stop all modern and traditional activities, which involve killing animals or cause their suffering. Traditionalists are trying to convince the community that using living creatures for men’s needs is natural and cannot be avoided in everyday life.

    Activists, who defend animal rights, are telling the world that people should not use animals in any way. Moreover, they say that animals should have exactly the same rights as humans do. The reason is that people and animals are both living creatures and there shouldn’t be any difference in treating them. So called extreme vegans are refusing to eat any food of animal origin, even milk or honey. They are trying to persuade people to do the same using as an argument that killing animals and keeping them in captivity cause their suffering and not civilized.

    Traditionalists disagree with the statement that human should stop killing animals or using them to fulfill their needs. From the very beginning of human civilization there has been a tradition and vital need to use animals as a food and their parts in traditional crafts. Without proteins and vitamins of animal origin human body wouldn’t receive all nutrients it needs. Besides, testing some medicines on animals already helped to fight many diseases people suffered from.

    I think, people have the moral right to use animals to their benefit, to some extent. I am sure, we should not make them suffer and die for our fun. Although using animals for food is natural for humans as predators, as civilized city dwellers we should make sure to use only humane ways of treating them.

     تحلیل مقاله

    Task response

    the essay is not off-topic

    the writer has stated his opinion concerning the given topic

    the central paragraphs are well-supported

    the writer has applied minimum 250 words

    Coherence and cohesion

    the message is clear

    the writer has applied linking words, cohesive devices, pronouns and transitions appropriately

    Vocabulary

    The writer has used a range of related words to the topic with appropriate collocations

    Grammar

    The writer has used a wide range of structure correctly

    Band Score: 7.5